The Daily Psyop

Kamala Harris signalled on Thursday she could take a tougher line against Israel, telling Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that she would not be “silent” on the suffering of besieged Palestinians in Gaza.

In a meeting that is likely to be scrutinised in Israeli and US foreign policy circles, Harris, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, took a more public approach to chastise Netanyahu over the devastating Palestinian death toll in Gaza than her boss, Joe Biden.

“What has happened in Gaza over the past nine months is devastating. The images of dead children and desperate hungry people fleeing for safety, sometimes displaced for the second, third or fourth time,” Harris told reporters after the meeting.

“We cannot look away in the face of these tragedies. We cannot allow ourselves to become numb to the suffering and I will not be silent,” she said, emphasising the need to reach a ceasefire.

Harris’s statements contrasted with the good-natured exchange between Biden and Netanyahu earlier on Thursday in the Oval Office, with the Israeli leader praising Biden as an “Irish-American Zionist” and Biden reflecting on his 1973 visit with Golda Meir.

Jewish Insider reported that the Harris-Netanyahu meeting left Israeli officials “disappointed”, with unnamed Israeli officials suggesting Harris’s comments on the staggering civilian death toll in Gaza could embolden Hamas.

However, it’s far from clear that Harris is prepared to depart from the longstanding tradition of US support to Israel.

‘Placate both sides’

Harris’s Jewish husband, Doug Emhoff, told a pro-Israeli group that Harris “has been, and will be, a strong supporter of Israel as a secure, democratic and Jewish state. And she will always ensure that Israel can defend itself, period.”

For thousands of pro-Palestinian demonstrators who turned up in Washington this week to voice their anger against Israel’s war on Gaza and US military support for the offensive, Harris’s comments are unlikely to go far enough.

Harris also did not attend Netanyahu’s fiery address to Congress on Wednesday, but her decision was slammed by pro-Palestine advocates.

“Harris seems to not want images of her standing and clapping for this toxic genocidaire but also not to totally cut him off. She senses where the political winds are blowing, but this attempt to placate both sides has its limits,” one user said on X.

Harris later issued a statement condemning protestors who burned the American flag, saying: “I support the right to peacefully protest, but let’s be clear: Antisemitism, hate and violence of any kind have no place in our nation.”

Activists slammed Harris for criticising the protests and refusing to publicly call Israel’s war on Gaza a genocide.

“[We] condemn the attempts of VP Kamala Harris to criminalize protests in Washington DC and for justifying the ongoing mass killings which have been called out by the International Court of Justice,” the Boston South Asian Coalition said.

The response underscores how Harris has broadly consolidated support among progressive US lawmakers – including Democrats Ilhan Omar and Ayanna Pressley – but still faces criticism among pro-Palestinian groups.

The Abandon Biden campaign invited Harris to meet with them in July, saying they had yet to be swayed to back her campaign.

“Our demands remain unchanged: call for and pressure an unconditional ceasefire in Gaza. The new candidate must address these critical issues and break from the destructive legacy of the current administration,” the group said in a letter.

Kamala Harris signalled on Thursday she could take a tougher line against Israel, telling Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that she would not be “silent” on the suffering of besieged Palestinians in Gaza.

In a meeting that is likely to be scrutinised in Israeli and US foreign policy circles, Harris, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, took a more public approach to chastise Netanyahu over the devastating Palestinian death toll in Gaza than her boss, Joe Biden.

“What has happened in Gaza over the past nine months is devastating. The images of dead children and desperate hungry people fleeing for safety, sometimes displaced for the second, third or fourth time,” Harris told reporters after the meeting.

“We cannot look away in the face of these tragedies. We cannot allow ourselves to become numb to the suffering and I will not be silent,” she said, emphasising the need to reach a ceasefire.

Harris’s statements contrasted with the good-natured exchange between Biden and Netanyahu earlier on Thursday in the Oval Office, with the Israeli leader praising Biden as an “Irish-American Zionist” and Biden reflecting on his 1973 visit with Golda Meir.

Jewish Insider reported that the Harris-Netanyahu meeting left Israeli officials “disappointed”, with unnamed Israeli officials suggesting Harris’s comments on the staggering civilian death toll in Gaza could embolden Hamas.

However, it’s far from clear that Harris is prepared to depart from the longstanding tradition of US support to Israel.

‘Placate both sides’

Harris’s Jewish husband, Doug Emhoff, told a pro-Israeli group that Harris “has been, and will be, a strong supporter of Israel as a secure, democratic and Jewish state. And she will always ensure that Israel can defend itself, period.”

For thousands of pro-Palestinian demonstrators who turned up in Washington this week to voice their anger against Israel’s war on Gaza and US military support for the offensive, Harris’s comments are unlikely to go far enough.

Harris also did not attend Netanyahu’s fiery address to Congress on Wednesday, but her decision was slammed by pro-Palestine advocates.

“Harris seems to not want images of her standing and clapping for this toxic genocidaire but also not to totally cut him off. She senses where the political winds are blowing, but this attempt to placate both sides has its limits,” one user said on X.

Harris later issued a statement condemning protestors who burned the American flag, saying: “I support the right to peacefully protest, but let’s be clear: Antisemitism, hate and violence of any kind have no place in our nation.”

Activists slammed Harris for criticising the protests and refusing to publicly call Israel’s war on Gaza a genocide.

“[We] condemn the attempts of VP Kamala Harris to criminalize protests in Washington DC and for justifying the ongoing mass killings which have been called out by the International Court of Justice,” the Boston South Asian Coalition said.

The response underscores how Harris has broadly consolidated support among progressive US lawmakers – including Democrats Ilhan Omar and Ayanna Pressley – but still faces criticism among pro-Palestinian groups.

The Abandon Biden campaign invited Harris to meet with them in July, saying they had yet to be swayed to back her campaign.

“Our demands remain unchanged: call for and pressure an unconditional ceasefire in Gaza. The new candidate must address these critical issues and break from the destructive legacy of the current administration,” the group said in a letter.

Italy will appoint an ambassador to Syria more than a decade since it exited the country due to President Bashar al-Assad’s deadly crackdown on protesters and subsequent civil war.

Stefano Ravagnan, who is currently the foreign ministry’s special envoy for Syria, was named as the ambassador and will be taking up his new post shortly.

In 2012, Rome recalled its diplomats from its embassy in Syria protesting “the unacceptable violence” of Assad’s government against the Syrian people.

After 13 years of war and half a million dead, Assad’s government has regained control of much of the country with Iran and Russia’s backing. The northeast is controlled by US-backed Kurdish forces, while other parts of the north are held by rebel factions and Turkish troops.

The Italian foreign minister, Antonio Tajani, said the move is designed “to turn a spotlight” on Syria.

It also comes a few days after eight EU countries, including Italy, called on the bloc to “review and assess” its policy in Syria.

“Our goal is a more active, outcome-driven, and operational Syria policy… This would allow us to increase our political leverage [and] the effectiveness of our humanitarian assistance,” said the foreign ministers of Austria, Croatia, Cyprus, Greece, Czech, Slovakia, Slovenia and Italy in a letter sent to the EU’s foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell.

The letter highlighted “the humanitarian situation” in Syria, which it said had “further deteriorated” as the country’s economy was “in shambles”.

The ministers suggested 10 areas that should be discussed “openly and without prejudice”.

They also suggested setting up an EU envoy to Syria, who would be assigned to re-engage with Syria’s ambassador to Brussels and coordinate with both Syrian and regional actors.

Other suggestions included starting a strategic exchange with Arab partners and dealing with the negative effects of EU sanctions that have been imposed against Assad.

Currently, there are only six EU countries that have operating embassies in Syria, Romania, Bulgaria, Greece, Cyprus, Hungary and Czechia.

Italy will appoint an ambassador to Syria more than a decade since it exited the country due to President Bashar al-Assad’s deadly crackdown on protesters and subsequent civil war.

Stefano Ravagnan, who is currently the foreign ministry’s special envoy for Syria, was named as the ambassador and will be taking up his new post shortly.

In 2012, Rome recalled its diplomats from its embassy in Syria protesting “the unacceptable violence” of Assad’s government against the Syrian people.

After 13 years of war and half a million dead, Assad’s government has regained control of much of the country with Iran and Russia’s backing. The northeast is controlled by US-backed Kurdish forces, while other parts of the north are held by rebel factions and Turkish troops.

The Italian foreign minister, Antonio Tajani, said the move is designed “to turn a spotlight” on Syria.

It also comes a few days after eight EU countries, including Italy, called on the bloc to “review and assess” its policy in Syria.

“Our goal is a more active, outcome-driven, and operational Syria policy… This would allow us to increase our political leverage [and] the effectiveness of our humanitarian assistance,” said the foreign ministers of Austria, Croatia, Cyprus, Greece, Czech, Slovakia, Slovenia and Italy in a letter sent to the EU’s foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell.

The letter highlighted “the humanitarian situation” in Syria, which it said had “further deteriorated” as the country’s economy was “in shambles”.

The ministers suggested 10 areas that should be discussed “openly and without prejudice”.

They also suggested setting up an EU envoy to Syria, who would be assigned to re-engage with Syria’s ambassador to Brussels and coordinate with both Syrian and regional actors.

Other suggestions included starting a strategic exchange with Arab partners and dealing with the negative effects of EU sanctions that have been imposed against Assad.

Currently, there are only six EU countries that have operating embassies in Syria, Romania, Bulgaria, Greece, Cyprus, Hungary and Czechia.