The Daily Psyop

Where Skepticism Meets Insight

NewsUncategorized

Europe’s AI Surveillance Race Against The Rules That Protect Privacy – ReclaimTheNet

 Europe’s AI Surveillance Race Against The Rules That Protect Privacy

As Europe’s top agencies chafe at democratic restraints, the line between efficiency and accountability grows dangerously thin.

Europol’s deputy executive director, Jürgen Ebner, is urging the European Union to relax its own legal restraints on artificial intelligence, arguing that the rules designed to protect citizens are slowing down police innovation.

He wants a system that allows the agency to skip lengthy rights checks in “emergency” situations and move ahead with new AI tools before the usual data protection reviews are complete.

Ebner told POLITICO that criminals are having “the time of their life” with “their malicious deployment of AI,” while Europol faces months of delay because of required legal assessments.

Those safeguards, which include evaluations under the GDPR and the EU’s AI Act, exist to stop unaccountable automation from taking hold in law enforcement.

Yet Ebner’s comments reveal a growing tendency inside the agency to treat those same checks as obstacles rather than vital protections.

He said the current process can take up to eight months and claimed that speeding it up could save lives.

But an “emergency” fast track for AI surveillance carries an obvious danger. Once such shortcuts are created, the idea of what qualifies as an emergency can expand quickly.

Technologies that monitor, predict, or profile people can then slip beyond their intended use, leaving citizens exposed to automated systems that make judgments about them without transparency or recourse.

Over the past decade, Europol has steadily increased its technical capabilities, investing heavily in large-scale data analysis and decryption tools.

These systems are presented as essential for fighting cross-border crime, yet they also consolidate immense quantities of personal data under centralized control.

Without strong oversight, such tools can move from focused investigation toward widespread data collection and surveillance.

🔗SOURCE ➡️ ReclaimTheNet

Related: 10/24 — UK Expands Online Safety Act To Enforce Preemptive Censorship For “Priority” Offenses

9/23 — UK Government signs partnership with Palantir.

9/20 — The UK’s new strategic partnership with Palantir is pretty wild — straight from gov.uk:

6/30 — 🚨Palantir And Accenture Federal Services Partner To Offer AI In US Government

6/1 — Trump Taps Palantir to Create Master Database on Every American

4/3/24 — Head of Controversial Global Engagement Center Admits Europe’s Regulatory Power Over Social Media Censorship Enforcement

1/22 — “I don’t Trust Palantir, Thiel, Musk and Co But At Least Its Not Kamala.”

Follow us on Minds / X / Substack

Boost This Channel

Follow ➡️ @PsyopDaily


READ FULL ARTICLE: This article originally appeared on ReclaimTheNet

TheMcgwire

Found of The Daily Psyop. Passionate about Foreign Policy. Have been actively involved in Independent Media since 2019.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *