The Daily Psyop

Where Skepticism Meets Insight

News

News

Archbishop of Canterbury says ending Israeli occupation is a ‘legal and moral necessity’

Archbishop of Canterbury says ending Israeli occupation is a ‘legal and moral necessity’

The Anglican leader has urged governments to uphold international law following the ICJ ruling declaring Israel’s occupation of Palestinian lands illegal

MEE staff

Fri, 08/02/2024 – 16:21

The archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, in central London on 3 December 2023 (AFP/Henry Nicholls)

The archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, has called for an end to the Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands and urged governments around the world to uphold international law. 

His comments on Friday were a response to an advisory opinion issued by the International Court of Justice two weeks ago, which addressed Israel’s presence in occupied Palestine.

The court found that Israel’s decades-long occupation of Palestinian territories was “unlawful” and that its “near-complete separation” of people in the occupied West Bank breached international laws concerning “racial segregation” and “apartheid”.

“The [ICJ] makes definitively clear that Israel’s presence in the occupied Palestinian territories is unlawful and needs to end as rapidly as possible,” said Welby. 

He added that at a time when the world is marked by increasing violations of international law, governments need to show an “unwavering commitment” to the ICJ’s decisions. 

“We must apply the law without fear or favour in all circumstances,” Welby said.

“But for too long it has been applied and upheld in a selective manner that threatens our common peace and security. Now is the time to reverse that deeply damaging trend.”

While delivering the court’s findings two weeks ago, ICJ President Nawaf Salam stated that Israel must make reparations to Palestinians for damages caused by its occupation, adding that the UN Security Council, the General Assembly and all states have an obligation to not recognise Israel’s occupation as legal.

Salam added that Israel’s policies and practices in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem amounted to the annexation of large parts of these territories and that Israel systematically discriminates against Palestinians in the occupied territories.

The advisory opinion has no binding force but carries significant legal and moral authority, and could increase pressure on Israel over its ongoing war in Gaza.

“Having visited our Palestinian Christian brothers and sisters many times over recent decades, it is clear to me that the regime imposed by successive Israeli governments… is one of systemic discrimination,” said Welby. 

“Through annexing Palestinian land for illegal settlements, depriving Palestinians access to their own natural resources, and imposing a system of military rule that denies them safety and justice, the State of Israel has been denying the Palestinian people dignity, freedom and hope.”

He said ending the occupation was a “legal and moral necessity”. 

“I pray that all UN member states respond positively to this advisory opinion by ensuring their individual and common actions are consistent with it – and pave the way for the realisation of the Palestinian people’s fundamental right to self-determination,” Welby concluded. 

Welby is the principal leader of the Church of England and ceremonial head of the worldwide Anglican Communion. 

In February, he expressed regret at declining a meeting with Palestinian Lutheran pastor Munther Isaac during a tour of the UK. 

Isaac had previously said that Welby’s aides had informed him that the Anglican leader would not meet him because he shared a platform with former Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn.

“This sums up the Church of England. They danced around positions and ended up saying nothing. They lack the courage to say things,” Isaac said at the time.

Welby posted a message on X, saying he regretted his earlier refusal and wanted to meet Isaac. 

“Recently, I declined to meet with Rev Dr [Munther Isaac] during his UK visit,” he wrote, continuing: “I apologise for and deeply regret this decision, and the hurt, anger, and confusion it caused. I was wrong not to meet with my brother in Christ from the Holy Land, especially at this time of profound suffering for our Palestinian Christian brothers and sisters.”

Read More
News

Archbishop of Canterbury says ending Israeli occupation is a ‘legal and moral necessity’

Archbishop of Canterbury says ending Israeli occupation is a ‘legal and moral necessity’

The Anglican leader has urged governments to uphold international law following the ICJ ruling declaring Israel’s occupation of Palestinian lands illegal

MEE staff

Fri, 08/02/2024 – 16:21

The archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, in central London on 3 December 2023 (AFP/Henry Nicholls)

The archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, has called for an end to the Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands and urged governments around the world to uphold international law. 

His comments on Friday were a response to an advisory opinion issued by the International Court of Justice two weeks ago, which addressed Israel’s presence in occupied Palestine.

The court found that Israel’s decades-long occupation of Palestinian territories was “unlawful” and that its “near-complete separation” of people in the occupied West Bank breached international laws concerning “racial segregation” and “apartheid”.

“The [ICJ] makes definitively clear that Israel’s presence in the occupied Palestinian territories is unlawful and needs to end as rapidly as possible,” said Welby. 

He added that at a time when the world is marked by increasing violations of international law, governments need to show an “unwavering commitment” to the ICJ’s decisions. 

“We must apply the law without fear or favour in all circumstances,” Welby said.

“But for too long it has been applied and upheld in a selective manner that threatens our common peace and security. Now is the time to reverse that deeply damaging trend.”

While delivering the court’s findings two weeks ago, ICJ President Nawaf Salam stated that Israel must make reparations to Palestinians for damages caused by its occupation, adding that the UN Security Council, the General Assembly and all states have an obligation to not recognise Israel’s occupation as legal.

Salam added that Israel’s policies and practices in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem amounted to the annexation of large parts of these territories and that Israel systematically discriminates against Palestinians in the occupied territories.

The advisory opinion has no binding force but carries significant legal and moral authority, and could increase pressure on Israel over its ongoing war in Gaza.

“Having visited our Palestinian Christian brothers and sisters many times over recent decades, it is clear to me that the regime imposed by successive Israeli governments… is one of systemic discrimination,” said Welby. 

“Through annexing Palestinian land for illegal settlements, depriving Palestinians access to their own natural resources, and imposing a system of military rule that denies them safety and justice, the State of Israel has been denying the Palestinian people dignity, freedom and hope.”

He said ending the occupation was a “legal and moral necessity”. 

“I pray that all UN member states respond positively to this advisory opinion by ensuring their individual and common actions are consistent with it – and pave the way for the realisation of the Palestinian people’s fundamental right to self-determination,” Welby concluded. 

Welby is the principal leader of the Church of England and ceremonial head of the worldwide Anglican Communion. 

In February, he expressed regret at declining a meeting with Palestinian Lutheran pastor Munther Isaac during a tour of the UK. 

Isaac had previously said that Welby’s aides had informed him that the Anglican leader would not meet him because he shared a platform with former Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn.

“This sums up the Church of England. They danced around positions and ended up saying nothing. They lack the courage to say things,” Isaac said at the time.

Welby posted a message on X, saying he regretted his earlier refusal and wanted to meet Isaac. 

“Recently, I declined to meet with Rev Dr [Munther Isaac] during his UK visit,” he wrote, continuing: “I apologise for and deeply regret this decision, and the hurt, anger, and confusion it caused. I was wrong not to meet with my brother in Christ from the Holy Land, especially at this time of profound suffering for our Palestinian Christian brothers and sisters.”

Read More
News

Selective Service Repeal Act Reintroduced in the Senate

In the face of moves in Congress to ramp up U.S. readiness to activate a draft, Senators Ron Wyden (D-OR), Rand Paul (R-KY), and Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) have reintroduced an alternative proposal to step back from the brink of mass military mobilization by repealing the Military Selective Service Act.

In 2016, 2021, and again in 2022, Congress came close to approving legislation to expand the requirement to register with the Selective Service System for a possible military draft to include young women as well as young men. In 2024, that proposal is moving forward again in Congress as part of the annaul National Defense [sic] Authorization Act (NDAA), along with a proposal to try to register all young people “automatically” for a possible draft.

The Selective Service Repeal Act, reintroduced this week in the Senate as S. 4881, would instead end draft registration entirely. This bill has been introduced several times before in Congress, starting in 2019, but has never gotten a hearing in either the House or the Senate.

Ending draft registration would put an end to the fantasy that the draft is always available as a “fallback” — a myth that enables planning for larger, longer, less popular wars without concern for whether people will volunteer to fight them.

Male U.S. citizens and residents are required to register with the Selective Service System when they turn 18, and notify Selective Service every time they change their address until their 26th birthday.

Draft boards have been appointed and trained throughout the U.S. The Selective Service System maintains contingency plans for a general “cannon fodder” draft of young men (based on the current list of registrants) and a separate Health Care Personnel Delivery System. Congress has ordered the Pentagon to conduct a comprehensive mobilization exercise including its readiness to activate a draft.

Few young men comply fully with the draft registration law. Most men who register for the draft do so only if and when it is required for some other government program, and almost nobody tells the Selective Service System when they move. Most draft notices would be returned as undeliverable. Even the former Director of the Selective Service System has testified that the current Selective Service database is so incomplete and inaccurate that it would be “less than useless” for an actual draft.

But the expansion of draft registration to women, and the new proposal to try to make it “automatic”, are bad ideas that won’t go away until Congress ends draft registration entirely.

In the 1980s, the government prosecuted a handful of vocal nonregistrants, including me, whose public statements could be used to prove that our nonregistration was “knowing and willful”. Those “show trials” proved counterproductive, showing other nonregistrants that there is safety in silence as well as safety in numbers. The government abandoned enforcement of the registration law in 1988.

In recent years, the failure of draft registration has become too obvious to ignore. In response, the Selective Service System has proposed that it be authorized to obtain any other Federal records that might identify or locate young people, and “automatically” sign all young people up for a future draft.

This is a recipe for a privacy-invasive fiasco. No Federal agency has up-to-date addresses for all U.S. citizens or residents, or the other information needed to determine who is eligible to be drafted. “automatic” draft registration would be expensive and would produce an incomplete, inaccurate list.

But without hearings or public scrutiny, this proposal by the Selective Service System for “automatic” draft registration has been included in the versions of the NDAA adopted by the House and under consideration in the Senate in 2024.

Congress should end draft registration entirely, rather than trying to extend it to women or make it “automatic”. The Selective Service Repeal Act would end preparations for a draft and restore the eligibility of men who didn’t register for the draft for government jobs, naturalized citizenship, and those Federal and state government programs from which they are currently excluded.

By preventing a draft, draft registration resisters are helping to protect us all against war. We can support them by asking our Representatives and Senators to support the Selective Service Repeal Act.

Ask your U.S. Senators to say “no” to attempts to expand or automate draft registration, and instead to support S. 4881 and the similar Senate floor amendment to the NDAA. Ask ask your U.S. Representative to reintroduce this bill in the House of Representatives. And urge House and Senate Armed Services Committee members to push for hearings on Selective Service repeal.

Edward Hasbrouck maintains the Resisters.info website and publishes the “Resistance News” newsletter. He was imprisoned in 1983-1984 for organizing resistance to draft registration.

Read More