Simone Biles eyes ninth Olympic gold in all-around gymnastics final
Biles says she was relieved after finishing the vault in the team finals without any flashbacks of Tokyo 2020.
Read MoreWhere Skepticism Meets Insight
Biles says she was relieved after finishing the vault in the team finals without any flashbacks of Tokyo 2020.
Read MoreThe Israeli government assassinated the leader of Hamas’ political wing while he was in Tehran to attend the inauguration of the newly-elected Iranian president Masoud Pezeshkian:
Ismail Haniyeh, the head of Hamas’s political wing, was killed in Iran, Hamas announced Wednesday, describing the death as an assassination. Hamas and Iran both blamed Israel and vowed to retaliate; the Israel Defense Forces declined to comment. Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said it was Iran’s “duty” to avenge the killing, and Hamas’s armed wing, the Izzedine al-Qassam Brigades, warned of “major repercussions” for the whole region.
Killing a top political leader of Hamas seems designed to scuttle any chance of a ceasefire in the near future, and doing this on Iranian soil seems all but guaranteed to provoke a strong reaction from the Iranian government and its proxies elsewhere in the region. Netanyahu couldn’t make it any clearer that he has no interest in ending the war in Gaza and that he welcomes a wider conflict. The Biden administration’s ongoing failure to rein in the Israeli government has allowed things to reach this point.
The region is on the edge of a knife, and the Israeli government has been trying for months to start a major conflagration. The assassination in Iran comes on the heels of an Israeli strike in Beirut this week and the attack on vital civilian infrastructure in Hodeidah in Yemen earlier this month. The Israeli attack on the Iranian consulate in Damascus back in April led to a significant Iranian military response. The Iranian government is pledging to avenge the Haniyeh assassination, and there will be tremendous pressure from their own hardliners to inflict more damage than they did in the last reprisal.
The assassination will be an important test for the candidates in the election. It is safe to assume that Trump has no problem with a reckless and dangerous assassination that risks war with Iran because he ordered one himself four years ago, and his running mate has defended that terrible decision on more than one occasion. That leaves Harris. As Spencer Ackerman writes today, this is Harris’ opportunity to demonstrate that she will be different from Biden on these issues:
Harris is not a passive observer. She is the second most-senior elected official in the United States, and this is the situation she is looking to inherit. We know that Trump wants to let the Israelis “finish the job.” Is that also Harris’ position, with a sprinkling of rhetorical compassion for Palestinians acting as cover for policy continuity? Or will she demonstrate the leadership necessary to stop a coalescing, escalating regional war that the United States possesses the material leverage on Israel to end?
Read the rest of the article at Eunomia
Daniel Larison is a contributing editor for Antiwar.com and maintains his own site at Eunomia. He is former senior editor at The American Conservative. He has been published in the New York Times Book Review, Dallas Morning News, World Politics Review, Politico Magazine, Orthodox Life, Front Porch Republic, The American Scene, and Culture11, and was a columnist for The Week. He holds a PhD in history from the University of Chicago, and resides in Lancaster, PA. Follow him on Twitter.
Read MoreThe Israeli assassination of Hamas’s political chief, Ismail Haniyeh, in the Iranian capital of Tehran is expected to derail negotiations for a hostage and Gaza ceasefire deal.
Qatari Prime Minister Mohammed Bin Abdul Rahman al-Thani, who has been mediating indirect talks between Israel and Hamas, expressed concern about the impact the assassination will have on the negotiations.
“Political assassinations and continued targeting of civilians in Gaza while talks continue leads us to ask, how can mediation succeed when one party assassinates the negotiator on the other side? Peace needs serious partners and a global stance against the disregard for human life,” al-Thani wrote on X.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was doing everything he could to sabotage the chances of a deal before his big trip to Washington, something that’s been widely acknowledged by Israeli media and officials.
Haniyeh was seen as Hamas’s leading proponent of reaching a ceasefire deal with Hamas. While Hamas’s top leader is Yahya Sinwar, who is believed to be hiding deep inside the tunnel system under Gaza, Haniyeh was the top official for the Palestinian group outside of Gaza and played a key role in the negotiations.
Progress toward a deal is not expected to be made as the region is bracing for Iran’s retaliation for the assassination on its territory and Hezbollah’s response to the Israeli killing of one of its top military commanders in Beirut.
US officials told Axios that they’re concerned the assassination of Haniyeh will derail negotiations and could lead to a major regional war. But the US is strongly backing Israel, as Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin vowed the US would defend Israel from any retaliation.
The circumstances around Haniyeh’s death are unclear. His deputy, Khalil al-Haia, said Haniyeh was killed while sleeping at an official guest residency in Tehran. Al-Haia said Haniyeh was struck by a missile, but it’s unclear if Israeli warplanes were involved. Israel has previously carried out attacks inside Iran using small quadcopter drones that explode on impact.
Haniyeh was in Tehran for the inauguration of Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, who is considered a moderate and pledged to pursue diplomacy to get Western sanctions lifted. But the Israeli assassination will likely also derail any Iranian plans to attempt to engage with the US on sanctions.
Read MoreIndia’s plans to produce oil palm domestically including in Assam sees setbacks as lack of processing units ruin crops.
Read MoreWinRed is allegedly overcharging and prompting recurring donations from elderly donors through deceptive practices.
Read MoreAn Israeli air strike killed Al Jazeera Arabic correspondent Ismail al-Ghoul and his cameraman Rami al-Rifi.
Read MoreA member of the Israeli Knesset has defended the idea of raping Palestinian prisoners after Israeli soldiers suspected of sexually torturing a detainee at the Sde Teiman detention facility were arrested.
The arrest took place on Monday, sparking protests from far-right activists, including several members of the Knesset and at least one minister in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s governing coalition.
In a meeting of lawmakers on the day of the arrest, Hanoch Milwidsky, a member of Netanyahu’s Likud party, was asked if it was legitimate “to insert a stick into a person’s rectum?”
Milwidsky replied, “Yes! If he is a Nukhba [Hamas militant], everything is legitimate to do! Everything!”
According to Haaretz, the Palestinian prisoner who was raped suffered from a ruptured bowel, a severe injury to his anus, lung damage, and broken ribs and was taken to the hospital for an operation.
The Times of Israel reported that two out of the ten soldiers arrested for the rape were released on Wednesday and that they were not the main suspects. The report also said that Honenu, a legal aid organization representing four of the soldiers, claimed the soldiers were acting in self-defense when they forcibly sodomized the Palestinian prisoner.
The condition of the prisoner confirms some of the worst allegations made by Palestinians who were previously held in Sde Teiman. Younis al-Hamlawi, a senior nurse who was detained by Israeli forces in Gaza after he left Al-Shifa Hospital over allegations that he was tied to Hamas, told The New York Times that Israeli soldiers penetrated his rectum with a metal stick, causing him to bleed and leaving him in “unbearable pain.”
The Times report said a leaked report from the UN “cited a 41-year-old detainee who said that interrogators ‘made me sit on something like a hot metal stick and it felt like fire,’ and also said that another detainee ‘died after they put the electric stick up’ his anus.”
Read MoreCalculating angular velocity and the moment of inertia isn’t quite as hard as competing in the 2024 summer Olympics gymnastics tournament—but it’s pretty darn tough.
Read MoreKatie Ledecky wins eighth gold medal as France’s Leon Marchand wins unprecedented two 200m swimming golds in a session.
Read MoreUkraine has received its first batch of US-made F-16 fighter jets from NATO, Bloomberg reported on Wednesday, marking an escalation of the alliance’s involvement in the proxy war.
Bloomberg’s sources did not say how many planes had arrived, only that it was a “small” number. They also said it was not immediately clear if Ukrainian pilots trained by Western countries to fly the F-16s could use them right away or if the process would take longer.
The Washington Post recently reported that only six Ukrainian pilots were expected to finish the training by this summer. If the F-16s are put in use soon, they’re expected to operate far from the frontlines as US officials fear they could be easily downed by Russian air defense systems.
Denmark and Norway are supplying the first batch of planes, and Belgium and Norway have also pledged to provide Ukraine with F-16s, but most won’t be delivered for years. The US hasn’t promised to provide the jets but has helped with training and will arm the F-16s with advanced missiles.
The Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday that the US had agreed to arm the Ukrainian F-16s with “AGM-88 HARM air-to-ground missiles; the extended-range versions of Joint Direct Attack Munition kits, which convert unguided bombs to smart weapons; and so-called small diameter bombs that explode with a tight blast radius. In addition, the U.S. will send advanced medium-range air-to-air missiles, known as AMRAAM, and AIM-9X short-range air-to-air missiles for the jets.”
Initially sold as a “game changer” for the Ukrainian military, the F-16s are not expected to have much impact on the battlefield. NATO countries first pledged to provide the jets in May 2023 after getting the OK from President Biden.
Read More